Jump to content

growopz

Regular Member
  • Posts

    103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

7 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

growopz's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

166

Reputation

  1. They're using the 'H' type. The 'H' driver is 91% - (you are presumably using the 'L' one then.) Yeah the drivers will let you push them way over max, especially the CV ones, but it's obviously not recommended, as the temps go to max.
  2. Just my 2c: Notice that the 220W light only has 416 LM301B diodes, and that the XLG-240 driver is only 91% efficient, and that aluminium plate is not a particularly good heatsink. According to the specs, it's only 200W at 230VAC, though I presume that's a misprint. XLG-240 should handle 220W.
  3. Hi @DamDave, LEDs get better efficiencies (lm/W) at lower currents and cooler temperatures. We have watt-meters in stock. It's possible to estimate with a very accurate multimeter, but a watt meter is simpler. Pretty useful in general too, to see your electricity use. You can grow seedlings with 15W. There's no need to blast them with 75W. But if you do decrease voltage, you need to be careful changing the voltage back up, as IV curves (voltage vs current) is an exponential curve, and you will damage the LEDs if they run for long, above their rated maxes.
  4. @Daan PosthumusThe QB-130 & 120W Luminus CXM-32 will both be R2500, and more appropriate for 80x80. People use up to 240W in 80x80, so it's all relative to expectations. The tent size just sets a max on the amount of light you can put in there before you get diminishing returns. The max is around 240W for 80x80. So an experienced grower can yield 75g+ with the QB-75. Yield correlates best to light wattage, with the QB board's efficiency important, but only accounting for max 18% difference in yield, at the same wattage. (That's calculated from the efficiency difference between running LEDs at nominal efficiency (65mA per LED) vs max power (200mA per LED). )
  5. Hi, Thanks for the tag, @SkunkPharm Finishing up backlog on small lights and receiving the rest of our heatsink order from January, next week finally, so am expecting to have the grow bar range back up soon, and new high efficiency veg range after that. If in big rush for a small light, Looking at the links above, the one website is just random chinese crap. I would advise against that. The modugrow one looks pretty sweet. I can't tell what the difference is between their 90W lights, but the specs are solid. It's 1/3 of a standard 240W Quantum board light, for R2k. The QB-75 will be back next week, and is going to be R1250 going forward. Compared to the 90W Modugrow, the QB-75 is about 10% less efficient, and 15W less, but also costs R800 less. So it's a slightly different value proposition.
  6. growopz

    Help plz

    Def the driver. It's pretty easy to fix, but requires either a 600mA or 900mA driver replacement, and you won't know what until you open it up.
  7. Migro did a video on them 1.49 PPFD/W Convenient, but not great efficiency. Looks like a bit of a death trap, too. Compared to buying a 2 PPFD/W light for twice the price, you'll save money up until you've used about 600kWh. So you'll get 500 days worth of 12hrs/day light (or 333 days of 18 hrs/day), until it becomes more expensive overall with electricity, than a 2.0 PPFD/W light. (Assuming price of electricity doesn't rise)
  8. There's a spectrum, *cough*, of compromise. AC COBs are on the far cheap-up-front end of that spectrum. AC COBs are just super inefficient and dangerous (1) the IC driver tech is not very good yet, and (2) those cheap COBs use inefficient blue LEDs hitting inefficient red phosphors, instead of just using red LEDs. (3) They can kill you or give you nerve damage, if you have an accident with exposed AC, and no grounding wire. @Trailblazer420 - Please put some hot glue or silicone over the AC pads. Do it for the children
  9. At 750W, (500w flower 12hrs/day, 250w veg 18hrs/day?) you'll end up spending a lot more in the long run with cheapies. 12*0.5 = 6 kWh 18*0.25 = 4.5 kWh 10.5 units * 30 days = 315 units/month That'll put you in a residential bracket, so at minimum, R1.90/unit. Or about R600/month. Migro measured the efficacy of two ebay AC COBs to be 0.29 ppfd/watt for the purple, and 0.65 ppfd/watt for the warm white. So let's say 0.45 as an average. So 750w of 0.45 ppfd/watt AC COBs are equivalent to 168W of a decent 2 ppfd/watt light. At the same 2/3 division of 12/18 hours/day, you'd spend 12*0.111=1.34 units 18*0.056=1 unit 2.34 units * 30 days = 70.2 units Or, R133.38/ month on electricity. So if the efficient, expensive light costs R3500, for example, and the DIY AC COBs cost R350, for example, 3500+133x=350+600x x= 6.74 months So that's how long you can use it (assuming they last that long) until it starts costing R467/month more to run the DIY setup. Anyway that's my party pooping 2c.
  10. I forget what shipping I used, sorry. Probably Fedex though, because it was fast. One week.
  11. "Citizen 1212 is probably the weakest brand-name COB on the market. " Citizen's not a bad brand name. Citizen invented the COB. I said the 1212 COB is not great, as far as COBs go. Why Blues? I get a lot of aquarium customers. The COBs will be good for making cheap marine tank lights. I'll probably also make a once-off grow light prototype with the blues and ambers, just for the hell of it.
  12. @PsyCLown It's one of our old prototypes
  13. They have a sale on, at the moment. I picked up a bunch of Vero29s for $15 and some Citizen 1212 Royal Blues/Ambers for $12. Shipping was pretty fast. They're likely trying to get rid of their Citizen 1212 and Vero29 stock. Citizen 1212 is probably the weakest brand-name COB on the market. Vero29 is a solid COB though. Better than Cree CXB3590 in all my testing. But Bridgelux has improved efficiency of their latest gen 7 COBs by 6%, so maybe they're trying to get rid of the older ones.
  14. Yeah, the info is a bit outdated. Black Dog LED released the first "3W" designs in 2010. Then moved on to "5W" LEDs around 2015. These days, QBs and COBs are made with 0.5W and 1W chips typically. Horticultural LEDs from Phillips, Cree, Osram, etc. are typically 3V and run at 350mA, for about 1W output., with 58%+ radiant efficiency. You can still get decent PAR with 3W/5W chips, but it's mostly because of the lenses. Pretty much only the Chinese still manufacture the 700mA and 900mA "3W" and "5W" chips, using Epiled/Epistar/Bridgelux dies, which max out around 25-30% radiant efficiency.
  15. What a bunch of BS. "Photopic luminous efficacy of radiation has a maximum possible value of 683 lm/W, for the case of monochromatic light at a wavelength of approximately 555 nm (green)" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_efficacy He's using the Cree Product Characterization Tool for his "800lm/W" without understanding that it's a spreadsheet tool, and not a specification. --- Samsung LM-80 test data has their chips maintaining 70% brightness for at least 93,000 hours (~10 years continuous) --- 186lm/W is a meaningless measurement for a red led. Cree XPE-HE 660nm radiant efficiency is on par with Osram SSL and Samsung LH351H (~59% radiant efficiency) --- Hybrid lighting systems historically refers to mixing LEDs and HIDs to get the benefits of both. No idea what hybrid spectrum is, or how it could possibly be 'new'. What, multiple wavelengths? --- Ok. Back to COBs and QBs.
×
×
  • Create New...