Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/23/2019 in all areas

  1. She is getting her fade on. @seedworx Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk
    4 points
  2. Ok, posted in the wrong thread. Here she is again. Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk
    3 points
  3. What is the benefit of making/using cannabis oil? I'm wondering because as I understand it the extraction seems potentially unsafe (butane / iso which could in theory have impurities), or using ethanol which seems hard to come by. So why go this route rather than an infusion (cannabutter etc), rosin (hard to extract too I guess) or hash etc? Is there some particular benefit? I'm a bit new to all this, so I'd love to understand more. Thanks
    1 point
  4. Would anyone be interested in buying my soil? Trying to find out if it would be worth putting time and money into
    1 point
  5. The auto's all have about a week or 2 left. They all have PM. So spraying Hydrogen peroxide. The 2 Charlotte's Angels I reckon another month and a half. Will have to Finish those inside if the cape winter comes this year. Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk
    1 point
  6. 1 point
  7. You will be able to get it from one of the leading grow shops. It contains 10+ years of experience refining the perfect mix for growing cannabis but to keep it short and sweet it contains 4 different soils , 6 composts , meals , worm castings , lots of other additives and an EM mix I have been working on for years .
    1 point
  8. Realizing I haven't updated for a few days. Yesterday was the start of week 7 and the girls are chugging on. The Fruit Spirit is starting to give some purdy colours again. Hopefully these pics aren't sideways. Third photo is of the Fruit Spirit, starting to foxtail very lovely. Fourth is the frosty Vanilla Kush just getting thicc. Fifth is our mafia dealer, Amnesia Haze. Sixth is the lovely DC OG, now this strain is something special as it will absolutely put you on tge couch and keep you there. Seventh photo is my small Strawberry Amnesia. Both those girls are doing okay but they had a rough start. Sent from my G3312 using Tapatalk
    1 point
  9. The problem is that the cdcsa is pushing for lisences that will excuse most of us. I am following what fieldsofgreenforall.org.za is doing. The model is an all inclusive model. Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk
    1 point
  10. Whats sad is that people think or are being taught that this low grade outdoor is what outdoor is supposed to look like. Ive grown and seen other outdoor bud that is the envy of some of the best indoor. If you dont have the grade needed to do proper business you shouldnt be. This is medicine we are talking about.
    1 point
  11. That was a rare interview with gargamel, trying to find out from him what his plans for the smurfs are.... Still no real answers imo. Im just not feeling that the courts are going to entertain this.
    1 point
  12. F-ing druid??? Is he for real? Sent from my VTR-L09 using Tapatalk
    1 point
  13. Watched that interview yesterday with Russel, I mean, that guy is a piece of work. Talk about evading questions and not knowing your arse from your elbow.
    1 point
  14. Never seen an episode before, got about 1 min in before my ears started to bleed lol.
    1 point
  15. I did. Thats why I have more questions than anything. At the same time this is happening and Brigadiers and Prosecutors start making decisions saying this is OK for some, while others are being arrested daily. What is stopping everyone from rebelling now against the leave the ConCourt has given us. Dont get me wrong. The Canapax idea is a great idea minus the whole traditional healer part. Its entirely premature and individuals are making decisions contrary to the ConCourts ruling. How will it all really stand up in court if the Hawks or the courts themselves take notice. What empowered those individuals to override the ConCourt? We have no clue what parliament will eventually conclude. This interim period is a make or break period for us that may very well influence the final law amendments.
    1 point
  16. Ah who am I kidding. Of course I'm picking a fight. Perhaps I should clean up my approach then so that we can keep it in everyones interest and constructive, albeit super critical. You see, I'm a nobody in the cannabis industry. I also have no aspirations to rise to anywhere. I am however an activist, determined to see the plant being freed for everyone. It has been criminal to incarcerate people for the possession of the plant. The court has given us the leave and partially decriminalised cannabis, which is a massive leap toward freeing the plant. Monetizing the plant is not freeing the plant, but rather transferring its captivity. All I see when I look at a co-op setup like Canapax, is an obscure attempt to recapture the plant by capitalising on it, capsulating it along traditional medicine lines, needing to be prescribed by such a healer? To what end? Making money? It is at best a poor coverup at an attempt to adopt the current black market trade and call it legitimate because of...?... titles, disribution points? Being the main oke? The first co-op? All I see is organised crime happening under the guise of "contracts", "permits", "licenses"... Where is this paperwork? Who vetted it? Approved it? How is it in line with current legislation? How are Canapax franchises already marketing cannabis? Exactly? I have asked Mr de Beer these questions and a few others this morning. I have hundreds more, but the devils advocate in me can wait patiently. Mr de Beer has a history with suspect permits/licenses in the past. Went to court and faced dismissals. The dismissals are now claimed as a victory although clearly weren't when reading through the judgements. It does seem very reasonable then to ask questions. Not as opposition, but for clarities sake. Instead of getting a single answer to very simple questions, mnr de beer decided he would rather posture that he thrives on opposition. Well, such arrogance and posturing means it hurts where I poked, doesn't it? Yes, in this situation specifically it seems that canapax is adopting some of what was driven by the late Dr Ambrossini whose input and work was phenomonal, and while the ConCourts ruling has not necessarily invalidated the legal loopholes that are being exploited here, It does certainly supercede these loopholes in its efficacy in actually freeing the plant. It does feel the late Drs work is being perverted for personal gain, while the decriminalisation has negated the need for this structure. It seems a blatant abuse of the Section 22 permit law. Cannabis heals on its own without needing diagnosis from a sangoma, or someone with a medical PhD. The only way the plant will ever be truly free, is when it costs nobody a cent, and nobody makes any money out of it. This is an unfortunate paradox I realize. The industry will become what it will become. I know I have absolutely no control over that. I am but one voice. I will remain vocal and present in my activism until the plant has been entirely freed for everyone. You see Russel. What would do everyone good is transparency with intention. I smell a rat. So prove me wrong. Sell me your idea. I would really like to know who benefits. The people, or white label organised crime? Its no secret who I am, and my story has never changed. Im here for the plant, not the money.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Johannesburg/GMT+02:00
×
×
  • Create New...